The Pats weren’t that good to begin with…

Head coach Bill Belichick of the New England P...

Image via Wikipedia

There is no question that the Patriots were awful on Sunday vs. Cleveland, they came out flat from the start and were never able to able to stop Peyton Hillis and Colt McCoy. Credit goes to DA/98.5 for comparing this beat-down to the Raven’s playoff game last year. We were teased to think we were back in the game few times (especially before Gronk fumbled ahead of half) but really didn’t have chance without an answer for Hillis (i.e. Ray Rice). This was a classic trap game, as predicted by EPSN’s Adam Shefter, and the Pats did not disappoint.

Although, looking back on it now, the only thing more overdone than the fans/media negative reaction off the loss, was the positive hype about the Patriots leading up to it. As the only one loss team in the league before the Browns game, the Pats mistakenly ended up atop the power rankings of Fox Sports, Fanhouse, ESPN, etc…They were not the best team in the league before the Cleveland game and they clearly aren’t after. They are adjusting to life without Moss, surviving a number of key injuries (e.g. Bodden, Taylor, Faulk) and one key holdout (Mankins), and rediscovering some of the old winning formula. Along the way they have found a way to win some tough games at the end. But this is by no means a finished product and anointing them as the best in the league off the Minnesota win was clearly aggressive. Bill Belichick approaches each season like he does individual games; figure out what you have early on then make the right adjustments to peak by the end. The 2010/11 version of the Patriots is still a work in progress. This is a young team, especially on defense, that will need every single game of the regular season to find its real identity.

Until the Cleveland game the Pats had made the best of a favorable first half schedule. Looking back on it now, they have beaten only one team with a winning record. Going a bit deeper, against quality opponents  (as defined by this very cool site) the Pat’s are 2-1, trailing PIT 4-2, INDY 3-1 and WASH 3-2. THE GOOD NEWS is they enter the 2nd half of the schedule as well positioned as anyone, especially in a season that doesn’t appear to have a dominant team. THE BAD NEWS is the upcoming schedule is BRUTAL. The Pats will get an immediate chance at redemption when they visit the Steelers (the real best team in the league up to this point) Sunday night. Watching how they bounce back off the Cleveland thrashing, and how the defense stands up to another strong running game, will be the best  indicator yet of what we really have in this 2010/11 entry. The five game stretch that follows (IND, @DET, NYJ, @CHI, GB) will either make or break them. Surviving this stretch at 3-3 would be a huge success, making them 9-5 w/@ BUF and MIA to close out the season. I just hope this loss to Cleveland doesn’t come back to haunt us come playoff time.

Advertisements

About Page4

Welcome to my blog. For those of you familiar with the Boston Globe newspaper, Page 4 is the box score page inside the sports section, and where I spent a disproportionate majority of my childhood memorizing stats and scores. My Page4 blog is an opportunity for me to hash thru what I think are the most interesting topics in the Boston and national sports scene. View all posts by Page4

2 responses to “The Pats weren’t that good to begin with…

  • Sleeveless Hoodie

    I am questioning the decision to start Mankins. Sure he is a perennial pro-bowler, and a great guard, but line play has a lot to do with chemistry and communication and tossing him back in after a mediocre week of practice might not have been a good football move. My other point of contention has to do with the overall team chemistry issue… didn’t the Pats just let go a malcontent (Moss) and the result was improved team chemistry? What message are you sending to the rest of your team when a guy who has badmouthed the org and held out for 8 weeks plus camp gets the starting nod just for showing up?

  • Page4

    Mankins holdout was a business decision on his part, i don’t think Belichick or the rest of the team holds this against him. As a result I don’t think Mankins stepping in was a chemistry issue. As for communications i don’t think the run game or the personnel is that much different from last year so not too worried about this either.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: